Search publications on improving welfare for animals in research

Introduction Selecting an appropriate analgesic for cats can be challenging due to potential unwanted side effects, short duration of action, or unsuitable presentation for home administration. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of dipyrone and tramadol (Sindolor Cats® tablets) for postoperative pain control in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Methods Thirty-six healthy female cats were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 12): GTD (dipyrone 12.5 mg/kg + tramadol 2 mg/kg), GT (tramadol 2 mg/kg), and GD (dipyrone 12.5 mg/kg). Treatments were administered orally every 12 h for 5 days. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane; all cats also received sacrococcygeal epidural lidocaine under ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the CMPS-Feline and the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS). Physiological parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate) and serum cortisol were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, and 24 h postoperatively. Rescue analgesia with morphine was administered when pain scores exceeded threshold values. Results The GTD group required less rescue analgesia (1/12) compared to GT (4/12) and GD (5/12). Although not statistically significant, pain scores were consistently lower in GTD. Cortisol concentrations were significantly reduced in GTD at 4 h compared to GT and GD. Side effects such as sialorrhea were markedly lower in GTD (2/12) versus GT (9/12) and GD (12/12). No signs of cardiovascular or respiratory depression were observed in any group. Discussion The combination of dipyrone and tramadol in a single oral formulation provided superior analgesia and fewer adverse effects than either drug alone. Cats in the combination group required less rescue medication, had significantly lower cortisol values, and experienced fewer side effects.

Introduction With the growing number of veterinary centers performing pacemaker implantation in small animals, a better understanding of anesthetic management of these procedures has become essential. Most available studies focus primarily on surgical techniques, with limited discussion of anesthetic safety, efficacy, and intraoperative complications. Materials and methods Eighteen anesthetic procedures for transvenous pacemaker implantation were retrospectively reviewed in dogs treated at a veterinary referral center in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2024 and 2025. All dogs underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation, electrocardiography and/or Holter monitoring, and echocardiography. Continuous intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, electrocardiography, respiratory rate, end-tidal CO2, oxygen saturation, temperature, and invasive or non-invasive arterial blood pressure. Collected data included age, breed, sex, anesthetic protocol, clinical conditions, intraoperative events, and outcomes. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or median (range) according to data distribution assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Group comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). Results Sixteen dogs (8 males and 8 females) underwent 18 anesthetic procedures, including two reinterventions. The main indication for pacemaker implantation was third-degree atrioventricular block (75%). Anesthetic protocols were individualized according to patient comorbidities. The most frequent anesthetic complication was hypotension (27.7%), successfully managed with fluid therapy and vasoactive support. Electrode migration occurred in 11% of procedures and required reintervention. No perioperative deaths were recorded. Discussion and conclusion Transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs was successfully performed under individualized anesthetic management despite heterogeneous clinical conditions and absence of a standardized protocol. Hypotension was the most common anesthetic complication but was effectively treated. The routine use of temporary external pacing provided an essential safety margin for maintaining perioperative hemodynamic stability. No perioperative deaths were recorded. These findings support the feasibility and safety of tailored anesthetic strategies for canine pacemaker implantation, although prospective studies with larger populations are warranted to define optimal standardized protocols.

Monitoring the health and well-being of research animals is essential for both ethical and scientific purposes. In songbirds, body weight is one of the main indicators of their overall condition, yet traditional weighing methods can be intrusive and stress-inducing, which could decrease their song rate. We developed an automated system for monitoring the weight of multiple birds in longitudinal neuroscience experiments, which often include birds tethered to data acquisition systems. Building on previous models that were mostly designed for weighing birds outdoors and in large housing cages, our design serves as a perch for the bird to stand on (a perch-scale) and meets the needs of neuroscience experiments by (i) minimizing cable entanglement to safely accommodate tethered birds, (ii) supporting long-term monitoring of individually-housed birds, and (iii) linking multiple devices into a unified control unit that oversees setup, calibration, and data acquisition. We deployed the system in the cages of six canaries for ten days and validated its accuracy against daily manual weighing. The precision and continuous monitoring of the perch-scale allowed observing physiological patterns such as overnight weight loss. Our system detected 22 sequences of overnight perching in five different birds, showing an average decrease of ≈4% of the bird’s body-weight overnight. We also found that daily weight estimates, derived from perch-scale data, were within the range of daily weight fluctuations (5–10%), as they deviated by less than 5% on average when compared to the manual weights. These results validate the device’s sensitivity for detecting subtle and health-related changes. By eliminating the need for manual handling of birds, this system offers a non-invasive, hands-free approach that reduces stress and improves the accuracy of health assessments. Future applications could integrate additional health metrics to provide a more comprehensive understanding of animal welfare in neurophysiology and behavioral studies.

Assessing the welfare of zoo-housed great apes is essential to ensure high standards of care, maintain zoos’ ethical and educational credibility, and support their conservation roles. However, welfare assessment remains challenging due to the complex cognitive, social, and behavioural needs of great apes and the limitations of existing evaluation methods. Many zoos rely on resource-based measures, which are easy to collect but lack the specificity needed to assess welfare accurately. In this study, we developed and tested a new standardized, evidence-based approach that integrated resource-based data with ecological and behavioural insights. This Ape Welfare Assessment, Resources and Ecology (AWARE) Tool was developed through collaboration with the Great Ape Welfare group (GAWg) and aimed to: (1) collect a holistic suite of resource and husbandry data that measures the constraints on the apes opportunities to express key naturalistic behaviours, (2) contextualize results within species-specific research on wild and captive great ape behavioural ecology and welfare, and (3) extend beyond existing zoo accreditation standards to support zoos aspirations for higher levels of welfare. Using data from zoo-housed chimpanzees, we tested whether this approach enhanced the validity of resource-based welfare assessments. Results demonstrate that the approach strengthens welfare evaluations and provides a more nuanced understanding of captive great ape wellbeing. We also propose a new validation framework for holistic welfare assessment tools such as this, where validating all individual indicators is neither feasible nor informative. Ultimately, we aim for the AWARE Tool to serve as a web-based resource for independent zoo use and formal welfare assessments. Future research will expand its application to gorillas and orangutans. This study represents a major leap towards establishing robust, species-informed and validated welfare assessment methodologies for zoo-housed great apes.

In intensive commercial pig production systems, the spatial distribution of elimination and lying behaviors plays a crucial role in pen hygiene, management efficiency, and animal welfare. Pen partition design and the provision of hiding facilities are key structural factors that may influence pigs’ spatial preferences; however, systematic evaluations of their combined effects remain limited. A total of 108 growing–finishing pigs were used in a 3 × 2 factorial design to assess the effects of different partition types and hiding facility configurations, as well as their interaction, on the spatial distribution of elimination and lying behaviors. Behavioral data were analyzed using non-parametric statistical methods. The results showed that partition type and hiding facilities significantly influenced the spatial patterns of elimination and lying behaviors (p 0.05). Elimination behavior was predominantly concentrated in the slatted floor area. The combination of a front-closed partition with a hiding facility significantly increased the proportion of disturbed elimination events (16.2 ± 14.3%), which was higher than that observed in the open partition combined with a hiding facility (7.9 ± 7.6%, p < 0.05). In contrast, the rear-closed partition design was associated with atypical elimination occurring on the solid floor area. Overall, pigs showed a clear preference for lying on the solid floor. The front-closed partition combined with a hiding facility significantly reduced the proportion of lying on the solid floor (64.6 ± 8.5%), whereas the open partition combined with a hiding facility resulted in a higher-than-average proportion of solid-floor lying behavior (80.6 ± 8.9%). These findings indicate that an open partition design combined with a hiding facility is more effective in maintaining functional separation between elimination and resting areas while reducing disturbed elimination events. This study provides experimental evidence to support structural optimization of growing–finishing pig housing, contributing to improved pen hygiene and enhanced animal welfare.

The largest survey to date of behavioral management practices among facilities breeding and housing nonhuman primates (NHPs) for research was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Its primary objective was to analyze and compare practices across the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (US), identify regional differences, and highlight opportunities for refinement. Detailed information was captured on the management of NHPs at 49 facilities in these regions. Most respondents reported the number of NHPs at their institutions, which totaled 50,842. The findings suggest large variation in NHP behavioral management practices between world regions. Facilities in the UK and EU are at the forefront of best practice in many components of behavioral management. These involve the proportion of NHP populations housed socially, the age at which infants are removed from dams, the provision of pen enclosures, caging exceeding the regulatory/accreditation minimum floor space, and destructible enrichment (including floor substrates). Comparisons with the results of previous surveys conducted in the US in 2003 and 2014 show positive changes and progress over time, including a greater proportion of facilities providing access to exercise enclosures with more frequent implementation. Some previously reported impediments to social housing involving clinical and staffing constraints as well as scientific instrumentation eased over time. While there were increases in the use of social housing for some species, there was no increase across all species over the six-year interval since 2014. The proportion of US facilities providing destructible enrichment for caged NHPs remained the same. Importantly, overall, the data demonstrate that, with knowledge transfer and sufficient resources, perceived constraints on key elements of behavioral management can be overcome to improve NHP welfare and facilitate good science. The findings have been used to identify and discuss recommendations for best practice to improve animal welfare.

Animal Welfare InstituteRefinement Database

Welcome to the Refinement Database

Search scientific articles, books, and other publications related to improving or safeguarding the welfare of animals used in research and testing.

Active Filters

Search Results

Analgesic efficacy of oral tramadol–dipyrone combination in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy (2026)

Anesthetic management and complications during transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs (2026)

Automated, stress-free, and precise measurement of songbird weight in neuroscience experiments (2026)

Biopierces: Drug-eluting ear tags for infection prevention in animal tagging (2026)

Comparison of analgesic efficacy between intrafunicular and intratesticular lidocaine injection in dogs (2026)

Developing and validating a holistic welfare assessment tool for zoo-housed great apes: Integrating resource-based measures with behavioural ecology insights (2026)

Effects of hand-rearing and group size on chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) social competence in captivity (2026)

Effects of housing and environmental enrichment on performance, welfare, and air quality in fattening pigs (2026)

Effects of natural and artificial shade on behavior, physiology, and productivity in water buffalo: A narrative review (2026)

Effects of pen partition design and hiding facilities on elimination and lying behavior of finishing pigs (2026)

Efficacy and adverse effects of three delivery methods for aerosolized salbutamol in anesthetized European moose (Alces alces alces): A case series (2026)

EPI-DOM framework for fish welfare assessment: External and internal indicators for tilapia in aquaculture (2026)

Ethological constraints and welfare-related bias in laboratory mice: Implications of housing, lighting, and social environment (2026)

Euthanasia methods in invertebrates: A critical narrative review of methodological and welfare standards (2026)

Evaluating behavioral management practices for laboratory nonhuman primates: An international survey (2026)

Exploring dietary practices and faecal consistency in zoo-housed cotton-top tamarins Oedipomidas oedipus (2026)

Factors affecting the effectiveness of captive-bolt stunning of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.) at commercial slaughter in Sweden (2026)

Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites as stress biomarkers in common buzzards (Buteo buteo) across rehabilitation phases: Implications for raptor welfare (2026)

Fermentation bed farming improves behavioral expression and stress resistance in geese (2026)

Fish welfare in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS): The imperative for environmental enrichment (EE) (2026)