Pairing rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): methodology and outcomes at four national primate research centers (2014)
Baker, K. C., Coleman, K., Bloomsmith, M. A. et al.
Abstract
Pairing laboratory macaques is a high priority goal for many behavioral management programs. There are numerous methodological differences in introduction procedures across facilities, including the intermediate stages used between single housing and full contact. A retrospective database of 4325 isosexual rhesus macaque pairs (2973 female, 1351 male) housed at four National Primate Research Centers was compiled. All subjects were over 4 y; mean ages at each center ranged from 8.4 to 11.1 y. One facility employed one intermediate phase consisting of a barrier allowing physical contact (?P facility?). Another used this method with the addition of an initial clear panel phase (?C-P facility?). Two other facilities employed mesh panels providing minimal contact (?M facilities?). The proportion of full contact pairings deemed successful (co-housed for a minimum of 14 days without problematic agonism/wounding) ranged from 52%-65% (females) and 32-69% (males). In comparison to the P facility, the C-P facility saw less success among females (?2=9.87; p<.005), but not males. In comparison to the C-P facility, one M facility saw more success among females (?2=8.14, p<.005), but not males. The other M facility required observation of grooming as an additional criteria for success and saw significantly less success in all comparisons (p<.0001) except female introductions at the C-P facility. Comparisons within facilities are needed to evaluate changes to introduction procedures and possible tailoring of methodology to sex.
Published
2014
Citation
Baker, K. C., Coleman, K., Bloomsmith, M. A. et al. 2014. Pairing rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): methodology and outcomes at four national primate research centers. American Journal of Primatology 76(S1), 104. (37th Meeting of the American Society of Primatologists Scientific Program, Abstract #207)
Full Article
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22382